Wellness Design

The field of architecture is beginning to recognize that successful design must satisfy three interrelated domains: environmental sustainability, organizational effectiveness, and human well-being. These three principles are related to Brundtland’s definition of sustainability and although there have been a lot of efforts in green and economic design, the last piece of the puzzle of addressing the well-being of people is more elusive. In many ways, the priority of architects and interior designers is the user experience and interaction with space. Well-being is tangentially addressed in all designs as the designer is continuously grounded in the user experience. Due to this, many aspects of wellness design are already found in existing designed spaces as ancillary benefits.[1]


Wellness, in general, can be defined as a state of being healthy in body and mind, especially as the result of deliberate effort. In interior design, wellness design is an intentional design approach to enhance the health, happiness, performance, and personal and professional growth of building occupants. Wellness design differentiates itself from other interior design practices as it relies on the individual’s environment. Individual spaces designed for wellness are ones that have positive impacts on work performance, psychosocial well-being, and health.[2]

The best distinction between current and proposed practices can be made is through an analogy using biological concepts of survival needs and well-being needs.[2] Survival needs deal with aspects of the environment that directly affect human health, such as clean air and water, lack of pathogens or toxins, and opportunity for rest and sleep. These are the concepts that are being addressed currently through sustainability design that mitigate SBS. Well-being needs, on the other hand, are more indirect and affect overall health through their relationship to fulfillment, quality of life, and psychological health. They are more allusive as failure to satisfy well-being needs produces psychosocial maladjustment and stress-related illnesses, which are more long-term to present. Boyden’s (1971) presented well-being needs that have relevance to interior design: (1) places for spontaneous social encounters, (2) ability to move between multiple social phases (e.g. from solitary work to group interaction), (3) controlled noise levels not much above or below that found in nature, (4) meaningful stimulation of one’s senses, and (5) an interesting visual environment.

[1] Heerwagen, Judith H. "Design, Productivity and Well Being: What are the links?." AIA Conference on Highly Effective Facilities. Cincinnati, OH. 1998. Page 1

[2] Heerwagen, Judith H. Page 2

[2] Boyden, S. "Biological determinants of optimal health." The Human Biology of Environmental Change by Vorster, DJM (Ed.). Proceedings of a conference held in Blantyre Malawi, April. 1971.

Works

Talks